Technology Ethics Discussion Cards | Socratic Seminar Digital Citizenship 7-12 — premium printable cover preview
PREMIUM
1 / 4
TECHNOLOGY & COMPUTER SCIENCE30 pages

Technology Ethics Discussion Cards | Socratic Seminar Digital Citizenship 7-12

ready-to-use
UM Printables
Instant download
Premium Resource— Instant digital download
$5.00$2.5050% OFF
Have a discount code?

Get 20% off when you apply a valid affiliate code.

Secure checkout · Instant download · No refunds

Sign in required

Preview PDF
More like this

Secure checkout. Instant download after purchase.

Format
PDF
Pages
30
Type
Premium
Delivery
Instant

Quick overview

### About the Resource

The **Technology Ethics Discussion Card Set** is a ready-to-use **Grades 7–12 resource for AI ethics, digital citizenship, critical thinking, and academic discussion**. Students examine realistic ethical dilemmas involving **artificial intelligence, privacy, surveillance, algorithms, automation, misinformation, bias, intellectual property, and data ethics**.

Designed for **Socratic Seminars, ELA discussion, Social Studies/Civics, Computer Science, STEM, debate, and advisory**, the stakeholder-based format encourages students to consider competing perspectives, justify claims, listen actively, and engage in evidence-based dialogue rather than simple yes-or-no responses.

Product description

🤖 **Move beyond “don’t share your password” and challenge students to explore the real ethical dilemmas of the digital age.**

This **Technology Ethics Discussion Card Set** includes **50 scenario-based discussion cards** designed for **Socratic Seminars in Grades 7–12**. Instead of simple yes-or-no questions, students examine complex technology ethics issues from five different stakeholder perspectives.

### 🧠 WHAT MAKES THIS RESOURCE DIFFERENT?

Every dilemma uses a **5-Stakeholder Perspective framework**. Students examine the same ethical issue from the viewpoints of:

**The User** **The Creator** **The Regulator** **The Ethicist** **The Investor**

This structure requires students to consider how the same technology decision can affect different groups in competing ways.

### 📓 SOCRATIC SEMINAR FACILITATION GUIDE

The included guide provides:

**What is a Socratic Seminar?** — Rationale and methodology

**How to Use These Cards** — Step-by-step inner/outer-circle setup and discussion flow

**Ground Rules for Students** — Ready-to-display expectations for respectful, evidence-based discussion

### 💬 50 DISCUSSION CARDS

The 50 cards represent **10 core technology-ethics dilemmas × 5 stakeholder perspectives**.

#### **AI Art Generation — Privacy & IP**

Copyrighted-art scraping versus open-source innovation

#### **School Surveillance — Surveillance**

Laptop monitoring to prevent self-harm versus student privacy

#### **Algorithmic Radicalization — Social Media**

Maximizing engagement versus promoting extremism

#### **The Autonomous Vehicle — Automation**

Replacing 10,000 truckers versus public safety

#### **Predictive Policing — AI & Surveillance**

Historical arrest bias versus crime prediction

#### **Deepfake Audio — Social Media**

Viral misinformation versus parody/free speech

#### **Genetic Data Privacy — Privacy**

Anonymized DNA sales versus medical-research profits

#### **AI Mental Health Companion — Automation & AI**

24/7 access to therapy versus duty of care

#### **Smart Home Subpoena — Surveillance & Privacy**

Doorbell-camera data versus Fourth Amendment rights

#### **Automated Grading & Bias — AI & Automation**

Teacher efficiency versus cultural-dialect discrimination

Each dilemma has **5 distinct stakeholder prompts**, producing **50 unique discussion cards**.

### ✍️ REFLECTION JOURNAL PROMPTS

Students receive **5 deep-dive post-seminar writing prompts** that ask them to:

Synthesize ideas from the discussion Examine their own biases Propose real-world legislation or rules

Structured lined spaces are included for written reflection.

### ✅ SOCRATIC SEMINAR ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

A **4-level, 4-category rubric** assesses:

**Preparation** **Participation** **Active Listening** **Critical Thinking**

### 🌟 WHY TEACHERS LOVE THIS RESOURCE

**Forces Nuanced Thinking:** The five-stakeholder approach moves students beyond black-and-white answers.

**Zero Prep:** Print, cut, and distribute the cards. The facilitation guide and rubric are included.

**Highly Relevant:** Topics include AI art, algorithms, autonomous vehicles, predictive policing, deepfakes, genetic data, and automated grading.

**Cross-Curricular:** Suitable for STEM/CS ethics, ELA argumentative work, Social Studies/Government, and Advisory.

### 🎯 IDEAL FOR

High School Digital Citizenship / Technology Ethics Middle School Advanced ELA / Debate Computer Science & STEM Capstones Social Studies / Civics / Government Advisory / Seminar Blocks

Frequently Asked Questions

How many discussion cards are included?

The resource includes **50 discussion cards**.

How are the 50 cards organized?

There are **10 core technology-ethics dilemmas**, with **5 stakeholder cards for each dilemma**.

What are the five stakeholder perspectives?

Students consider each dilemma as **The User, The Creator, The Regulator, The Ethicist, and The Investor**.

What technology-ethics topics are addressed?

The dilemmas cover **AI art generation, school surveillance, algorithmic radicalization, autonomous vehicles, predictive policing, deepfake audio, genetic data privacy, AI mental health companions, smart-home subpoenas, and automated grading and bias**.

Are the scenarios designed for simple yes-or-no discussion?

No. The resource is specifically designed to **push students beyond black-and-white thinking** by examining competing stakeholder perspectives.

Is a Socratic Seminar guide included?

Yes. The resource includes a **Socratic Seminar Facilitation Guide** covering the seminar methodology, setup, discussion flow, and student ground rules.

Does the guide explain how to organize the seminar?

Yes. It includes **step-by-step instructions for an inner/outer-circle setup and discussion flow**.

Are student discussion expectations included?

Yes. The guide provides **ready-to-display ground rules for respectful, evidence-based debate**.

Is a reflection activity included?

Yes. The Reflection Journal Prompt Set contains **5 post-seminar writing prompts**.

What do the reflection prompts ask students to do?

Students are asked to **synthesize the discussion, examine their own biases, and propose real-world legislation or rules**.

Is a seminar grading rubric included?

Yes. The resource includes a **4-level, 4-category Socratic Seminar Assessment Rubric**.

What does the rubric assess?

It evaluates **Preparation, Participation, Active Listening, and Critical Thinking**.

Can the cards be used across different subjects?

Yes. The description identifies applications in **STEM/CS ethics, ELA argumentative units, Social Studies/Government, and Advisory periods**.

What grade levels are targeted?

The resource is designed for **Grades 7–12**.

Can this be used in Computer Science or STEM classes?

Yes. **Computer Science & STEM Capstones** are specifically listed as an intended use.

Can the resource support debate or argumentative work?

Yes. It is specifically suited to **Middle School Advanced ELA / Debate** as well as Socratic Seminar discussion.

Is the resource suitable for Social Studies or Civics?

Yes. **Social Studies / Civics / Government** is specifically listed as an intended setting.

What makes the stakeholder framework useful?

It requires students to consider the ethical consequences of a dilemma from **five different perspectives rather than evaluating the issue from only one viewpoint**.

Teachers also viewed